(3 or more of)

i. states the need for a solution to a problem

• states that there are safety problems in the workshop but gives very little explanation

i. outlines the need for a solution to a problem

• outlines some problems in the workshop (e.g. sharp tools, accidents, unsafe behaviour) and gives a simple explanation of why these are concerns

i. explains the need for a solution to a problem

• explains clearly the main safety problems in the workshop and why these problems need to be addressed

i. explains and justifies the need for a solution to a problem

• explains in detail a range of safety problems in the Design Workshop and fully justifies why addressing these problems is important

.

ii. states some points of research needed to develop a solution, with some guidance

• states some relevant areas of research (e.g. hazards, poster examples, safety rules), but research questions are basic

ii. states and prioritizes the main points of research needed to develop a solution to the problem, with some guidance

• states and prioritises useful research areas in detail (e.g. common hazards, design elements that help communication, workshop safety expectations) and develops clear guiding research questions

ii. states and prioritizes the main points of research needed to develop a solution to the problem, with minimal guidance

• states a wide range of research areas and prioritizes the research logically, explaining why some areas are most important, using specific, well-thought-out research questions that link directly to the design challenge

.

iii. states the main features of an existing product that inspires a solution to the problem

• states some of the main features of some posters

iii. outlines the main features of an existing product that inspires a solution to the problem

• outlines the main features of posters and safety posters by commenting on design choices (colour, layout, symbols) and how these affect understanding

iii. describes the main features of an existing product that inspires a solution to the problem

• describes a range of posters, explaining in detail how design elements (e.g. icons, clarity, text size) affect the success or failure of communication and Identifies ideas they can use to improve their own design

.

iv. states the findings of research

• states a simple and brief statement of what they plan to create, with little detail

iv. outlines some of the main findings of research

• outlines a design brief that includes the problem and mentions the audience, though not in full detail

iv. outlines the main findings of relevant research

• outlines a clear design brief that combines the problem, audience, research findings, and poster analysis and includes objectives for the design

iv. presents the main findings of relevant research

• presents a detailed and well-structured design brief that combines the problem, audience, key research findings, analysis of posters, objectives, and deliverables

(3 or more of)

i. states one basic success criterion for a solution

• states a very simple list of requirements (for example, just size or a single safety message)

i. states a few success criteria for the solution

• states a basic list of specifications, covering some aspects such as size, materials, colours, and messages, but not always clearly linked to research or audience needs

i. develops a few success criteria for the solution

• develops a clear and detailed set of design specifications, with several specific requirements (e.g. size, materials, colour scheme, messages, accessibility, cultural sensitivity), based on research, audience, and design brief

i. develops a list of success criteria for the solution

• develops a thorough and well-justified set of design specifications showing strong connection to research, audience, cultural aspects, and the design brief, considering all necessary features to make the poster effective for its purpose and users

.

ii. presents one design idea, which can be interpreted by others

• presents one or two simple ideas with limited detail or variation

ii. presents more than one design idea, using an appropriate medium(s) or

labels key features, which can be interpreted by others

• presents a few different ideas (at least two), with basic annotated sketches and some attempts at varying layout, visuals, or messaging

ii. presents a few feasible design ideas, using an appropriate medium(s) and labels key features, which can be interpreted by others

• presents several (three or more) thoughtful poster ideas, showing different approaches to layout, colour, images, and safety messaging and provides annotations for how the ideas fit the design specification

ii. presents feasible design ideas, using an appropriate medium(s) and outlines the key features, which can be correctly interpreted by others

• presents a range (three or more) of creative and varied poster ideas, showing different layouts, visual elements, and messaging and provides detailed annotation for how each idea meets the specification and will communicate safety effectively to the chosen audience

.

iii. states the key features of the chosen design

• states the chosen design with a more detailed sketch

iii. presents the chosen design stating the key features

• presents the final design using a clear, detailed drawing and explains with reasons how it best matches the specification and why it is more effective than the other ideas

iii. presents the chosen design describing the key features

• presents a well-developed and detailed chosen design, with a high-quality drawing that matches the specification, with detailed reasons for this choice, including details about how it will communicate safety information clearly and effectively to the target audience

.

iv. creates an incomplete planning drawing/diagram

• creates a very simple final version in Canva, with only basic features present

iv. creates a planning drawing/diagram or lists requirements for the creation of the chosen solution

• creates a clearer final version in Canva, including most key details (layout, images, text), but with some basic elements missing or unclear

iv. creates a planning drawing/diagram and lists the main details for the creation of the chosen solution

• creates a final version in Canva with all important features from the specification and previous ideas, presented clearly and neatly

iv. creates a planning drawing/diagram, which outlines the main details for making the chosen solution

• creates a high-quality, detailed final poster in Canva showing all features from the design specification and chosen idea, which is clear, visually strong, and ready for the next steps of production

(3 or more of)

i. defines a testing method, which is used to measure the success of the solution

• defines very simple or unclear methods to test the poster (e.g. only asks one person for feedback)

i. defines a relevant testing method, which generates data, to measure the success of the solution

• defines basic testing methods (such as surveys, asking classmates, or quizzes), but with limited planning or simple questions that don’t fully match the poster’s goals

i. defines relevant testing methods, which generate data, to measure the success of the solution

• defines clear testing methods (such as using surveys, quizzes, or feedback from peers) that connect to the aims of the poster and explains why these methods were chosen to help test understanding of safety messages

i. outlines simple, relevant testing methods, which generate data, to measure the success of the solution

• outlines well-planned and justified testing methods specifically matched to poster goals (e.g. well-structured survey, class feedback, safety quiz) and explains in detail how these methods will measure if the safety messages work for the intended audience

.

iv. states the success of the solution

• states poster’s success in a very simple way (e.g. “My poster was good”)

ii. states the success of the solution against the design specification based on the results of one relevant test

• states the success of the poster using some results from testing, mentioning what worked or didn’t but with little detail

ii. states the success of the solution against the design specification based on relevant product testing

• states the success of the poster by using the results from testing and shares what was successful and what missed the goals, linking back to the design plan

ii. outlines the success of the solution against the design specification based on authentic product testing

• outlines the success of the poster thoroughly, using testing results to discuss what worked, what didn’t, and how well it matched the original design goals and poster aims

.

iii. states one way in which the solution could be improved

• states at least one possible improvement in a simple or generalised way (eg. "make it better")

iii. outlines one way in which the solution could be improved

• outlines how specific features of the poster could be improved based on testing

iii. outlines how the solution could be improved

• outlines a range of specific improvements, showing how each suggestion arises from feedback and how each change would make the poster more effective for its users

.

iv. states one way in which the solution can impact the client/target audience

• states a way the poster might help safety in the Design environment or communicate safety messages

iv. outlines the impact of the solution on the client/target audience, with guidance

• outlines with detail how the poster could make a difference, help people stay safe, and communicate safety messages in the Design environment

iv. outlines the impact of the solution on the client/target audience

• thoroughly outlines the possible real-life impact of the poster on safety and communication in the Design environment and reflects on cultural and ethical issues, showing a deeper understanding of who might benefit and why